You know - for the kids...

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

When a death is a murder

So we know that the Administration will lie about anything. As such, that striking reduction in murders in Baghdad claimed by the military is bullshit. From the AP:

The American military did not count people killed by bombs, mortars, rockets or other mass attacks including suicide bombings when it reported a dramatic drop in the number of murders in the Baghdad area last month, the U.S. command said Monday.

The decision to include only victims of drive-by shootings and those killed by torture and execution, usually at the hands of death squads, allowed U.S. officials to argue that a security crackdown that began in the capital Aug. 7 had more than halved the city's murder rate.

But the types of slayings, including suicide bombings, that the U.S. excluded from the category of "murder" were not made explicit at the time.

What the fuck? The Administration does not have the decency or respect to tally a death as a murder unless the poor bastard suffered a bit before meeting his maker. Seriously, these dicks tried to push the phrase “homicide bomber” into the lexicon. But now that “homicide bombing” deaths are screwing up the bottom line, that notion is no longer operative. So homicide no longer equates to murder people – get it straight. Oy.

These are horrible, despicable people who will say anything to cast the glimmer of success on their failed policies. This is just more of the same.

BTW– Am I the only one reminded of when Marion Barry claimed that “If you take out the killings, Washington actually has a very very low crime rate”?

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh yes. Its everywhere. There are lies damn lies and statistics, and this administration in particular is very adamant that nothing negative be released about any initiative. I know because its my job to give them statistics and resist the pressure to lie about it.

If the administration doesn't like what the outcome of a study is, they just don't release it, cancel the contract (in effect negating the assignment, and its like we've never done the study) or only release certain parts of it.

It just happened to me because they chose to measure the effectiveness of a program in the first 30 days after it ended. When I measured it 6 months, 1 year, 5, months ahead, I found it wasn't effective. Rather than fix the program (43 million dollars of your tax money btw.) they quashed my findings and kept on going.

Domestically, internationally, in every area of policy it happens. I tell people basically that if they see a news item that says a government program isn't working, they can take it to mean that it is an utter waste of resources.

8:47 AM

 

Post a Comment

<< Home